Feb 20th

Fake skeptics of climate change won't be swayed by good science

By Nell Crowden

Fake skeptics of climate change won't be swayed by good science, by Stephen Hume, Vancouver Sun 

"They are false skeptics. They're not really interested in even-handed examination of competing ideas. They practise what's called confirmation bias, cherry-picking evidence favourable to predisposed beliefs. They practise faith, not science.... Genuine skeptics would poring over the documents, following the money, connecting the dots, analyzing what it meant and reaching conclusions about the relative merits of spin and the science it seeks to discredit."

Feb 18th

NHS Sustainable Development Conference 2012

By Ruchi Baxi
The NHS Sustainable Development Conference 2012, which was held on the 14th February, was an action orientated showcase of innovation for sustainable healthcare (http://www.nhssd.co.uk/index.php/Home.html). It was impressive to see the volume of possible solutions available and the experience of organisations who had put them to action. The day reinforced the message that solutions to improve environmental sustainability go hand-in-hand with financial and social sustainability, and improving the patient experience - win-win!
Feb 18th

Call to reveal ALL funding behind climate sceptics

By Nell Crowden

Statement from climate scientists and health professionals:

Call to reveal ALL funding behind climate sceptics
 

What motivates the Heartland Institute? As climate and other scientists and health professionals, we view the systematic sowing of unjustified doubt about mainstream international climate science as confusing at best, and inhumane at worst. The Hippocratic Oath, the values of which generations of health professionals have adhered to, declares ‘first, do no harm’. In 2009, The Lancet declared, "climate change is the biggest global health threat of the twenty-first century". Healthcare professionals have a duty to protect patients from disease and environmental harm. Biomedical treatment is just one form of healthcare. Public health professionals study relationships between climate change, sustainability, human health, carbon, physiology, and weather events. Scientific evidence demonstrates that sustainable development can bring with it health benefits, making it a win-win scenario (Lancet, November 2009). We only have a few years to drastically reduce our greenhouse gas emissions to avert dangerous climate change. Given the disproportionate influence given to climate sceptics by the media, it is in the public, national, and global interest for all funding behind their activities to be revealed. This will help people to make up their own minds about the truth of the climate change threat, so that action can be planned on the basis of evidence rather than confusion.

Signed by:

 

Professor Chris Rapley CBE, Professor of Climate Science, University College London

 

Dr. Jim Hansen, Climatologist, Columbia University


Anthony J. McMichael AO, FTSE

Professor of Population Health, and NHMRC Australia Fellow

The Australian National University


Professor Tim O'Riordan OBE, DL, FBA

 

Corinne Le Quéré,

Professor of Climate Change Science and Policy

 

Professor Martin McKee CBE MD DSc

Professor of European Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Professor Sue Atkinson CBE

Visiting Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London

 

Professor Sir Andy Haines,

Professor of Public Health and Primary Care, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine


Jonathan Patz, MD, MPH
Professor and Director, Global Health Institute
University of Wisconsin

Dr Andrea Forde 
BMedSci, MBChB, MACTM 
Public Health Physician, Visiting Fellow Australian National University 

Dr Richard Jaine, BSc MBChB MPH FNZCPHM
Senior Lecturer and Public Health Medicine Specialist
Department of Public Health, University of Otago

Roland Clift CBE FREng FIChemE HonFCIWEM FRSA

Emeritus Professor of Environmental Technology,

Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey

 

Walter Wehrmeyer MA PhD MIEMgt CEnv FRSA

Centre For Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey

 

Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, 

Professor and Director, 

Global Change Institute, 

University of Queensland

 

Dr. Robin Stott,

Physician, (retired)

 

Michael Moore 

CEO, Public Health Association of Australia

 

Professor Anthony Capon MBBS PhD FAFPHM

Head, Discipline of Public Health, Faculty of Health

University of Canberra


Professor Paul Ekins

Professor of Energy and Environment Policy

UCL Energy Institute, University College London


Chris France

Professor of Environmental Technology

Director of the IDC in Sustainability for Engineering & Energy Systems

University of Surrey


Dr Jamie Hosking
MBChB, MPH, FNZCPHM
Senior Research Fellow
University of Auckland

Dr Rebecca Randerson
MBChB(dist) FRNZCGP
General Practitioner/Lecturer
Wellington New Zealand


Professor John Wiseman
Professorial Fellow
Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute
University of Melbourne

Fiona Armstrong

Dr George Laking 
MD PhD FRACP
Consultant Medical Oncologist
Auckland District Health Board

Doug Sellman MBChB, PhD, FRANZCP, FAChAM, 
Professor, University of Otago, New Zealand

Associate Professor Richard Milne PhD, MRSNZ
School of Population Health
University of Auckland

Dr Peter Tait, RACGP General Practitioner of the Year 2007, Canberra

Dr Sudhvir Singh MBChB BMedSci
Waitemata District Health Board


Dr. Catherine Brogan MBBS FFPHM
Chief Executive
Public Health Action Support Team CIC

Dr Graeme Lindsay, FNZCPHM

OraTaiao: New Zealand Climate & Health

 

Dr Vivian Fu, MBChB, medical registrar

 

Dr Alex Macmillan MBChB, MPH

Senior Lecturer Environmental Health, School of Population Health, University of Auckland and OraTaiao, NZ Climate and Health

 
Monique Decortis
 

Dr Scott Metcalfe
MBChB, FNZCPHM
Chief Advisor Population Medicine, public health physician
Co-Convenor, OraTaiao: New Zealand Climate and Health

 

Joanna Santa Barbara

MB.BS, FRANZCP, FRCP(C)

Research Associate, University of Otago

 

Stephan Lewandowsky

Australian Professorial Fellow

School of Psychology

University of Western Australia

 

Russell Tregonning MBChB, FRACS, FNZOA.
Orthopaedic Surgeon and Senior Lecture,

University of Otago

Forbes McGain
Anaesthetist and Intensive Care Physician
Western Health, Victoria


Dr Susie Burke, Senior Psychologist, Public Interest, Environment & Disaster Response, Australian Psychological Society


Dr Bronwyn Wauchope, Clinical Psychologist

Colin Axon, Senior Research Fellow, School of Engineering and Design, Brunel University, UK 
 

Feb 13th

2C warming goal now 'optimistic' - French scientists

By Nell Crowden

2C warming goal now 'optimistic' - French scientists


French scientists unveiling new estimates for global warming said on Thursday the 2 C (3.6 F) goal enshrined by the United Nations was "the most optimistic" scenario left for greenhouse-gas emissions.

The estimates, compiled by five scientific institutes, will be handed to the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for consideration in its next big overview on global warming and its impacts.

The report -- the fifth in the series -- will be published in three volumes, in September 2013, March 2014 and April 2014.

The French team said that by 2100, warming over pre-industrial times would range from two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) to 5.0 C (9.0 F).

The most pessimistic scenarios foresee warming of 3.5-5.0 C (6.3-9.0 F), the scientists said in a press release.

Achieving 2C, "the most optimistic scenario," is possible but "only by applying climate policies to reduce greenhouse gases," they said.

In its Fourth Assessment Report published 2007, the IPCC said Earth had already warmed in the 20th century by 0.74 C (1.33 F).

It predicted additional warming in the 21st century of 1.1-6.4 C (1.98-11.52 F), of which the likeliest range was 1.8-4.0 C (3.24-7.2 F).

The French estimates are derived from two different computer models that crunch data for four scenarios based on atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide (CO2), the main greenhouse gas.

The work differs from previous calculations as it takes into account the reflectivity of clouds and uptake of CO2 by the oceans and other factors that can skew the equation, the authors said.

Meeting in Cancun, Mexico in December 2010, countries under the UN Framework Convention onClimate Change (UNFCCC) set 2 C (3.6 F) above pre-industrial times as the maximum limit for warming.

They vowed to consider lowering it to 1.5 C (2.7 F) if scientific evidence warranted this.

Small island states and other poor nations badly exposed to climate change are lobbying for the 1.5 C (2.7 F) limit.

Feb 7th

Is climate change bringing the Arctic to Europe?

By Nell Crowden

The UK Independent newspaper:

Science behind the big freeze: is climate change bringing the Arctic to Europe?


The bitterly cold weather sweeping Britain and the rest of Europe has been linked by scientists with the ice-free seas of the Arctic, where global warming is exerting its greatest influence.

A dramatic loss of sea ice covering the Barents and Kara Seas above northern Russia could explain why a chill Arctic wind has engulfed much of Europe and killed 221 people over the past week.

Feb 3rd

Check With Climate Scientists for Views on Climate

By Nell Crowden

One of the clearest and most direct letters on climate change:


Check With Climate Scientists for Views on Climate

Do you consult your dentist about your heart condition? In science, as in any area, reputations are based on knowledge and expertise in a field and on published, peer-reviewed work. If you need surgery, you want a highly experienced expert in the field who has done a large number of the proposed operations.

 

You published "No Need to Panic About Global Warming" (op-ed, Jan. 27) on climate change by the climate-science equivalent of dentists practicing cardiology. While accomplished in their own fields, most of these authors have no expertise in climate science.

Feb 1st

UK Public say they want a sustainable NHS even if it costs money

By Nell Crowden
"More than nine in ten (92%) of the public recently interviewed in a specially commissioned survey say they want the NHS to be more sustainable with 33% saying it should be done even if it were to cost the health service money."

This is also in the new report from the NHS Sustainable Development Unit today - very important so you get two blogs on the same report :)

Download it (again) here.
Feb 1st

NHS Carbon Emissions "levelling off"!

By Nell Crowden
Today we are delighted to announce the release of the NHS Sustainable Development Unit's 2012 Healthcheck report. 

"In the first independent survey of its kind 92% of the public questioned said it is important that the NHS works in a more sustainable way with 19% feeling sustainability should be a top priority."

Also.. Summary of Progress, Taking Action, Regional Perspectives, and Next Steps. 

Download this report here.
Feb 1st

New EU data

By Hugh Montgomery

New EU analysis (http://ec.europa.eu/clima/news/articles/news_2012013002_en.htm) today shows that a 30% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions across all EU countries. by 2020 would be far cheaper than expected. The target could be introduced this March, providing huge benefits to public health,

 

OF NOTE:
  • An improved 30% by 2020 emissions reduction target will cost European countries next to nothing (0.02% GDP)
  • Innovation costs are offset by  annual savings of €20bn on fuel expenses between 2016-20 through the 30% target, which also reduces dependence on imported fossil fuels
  • The 30% target will boost air quality, save on pollution costs of €3.6bn p/y, and deliver annual health benefits worth €3.3-7.6bn
  • The 30% target will create 1.5 million extra European jobs by 2020 in clean technology and renewables.

EVERYONE WINS!

  • Spread the word!
  • Ask your politicians (MEPs, MPs) to support.
Jan 31st

‘Win-wins’: Tips to help people improve health, save carbon and save money at the same time

By Ruchi Baxi
The message is clear - "what's good for the climate is good for our health". But what can we do to make a difference in our day to day professional lives? Here are five "win-wins" that can improve health, reduce carbon emissions, and save money at the same time! Please visit http://www.climateandhealth.org/practical_actions_for_health.html